Showing posts with label Labour Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labour Party. Show all posts

Sunday, 3 December 2017

Voting... why bother?

If you don't vote in elections because you feel that your vote won't make a difference, please think again!

In the 2017 General Election (GE) some 12,878,460 people (40% of the vote) supported Labour candidates, whilst the Conservatives gained 13,669,883 votes - just 791,423 more than did Labour - which, due to the FPPT voting system in the UK, resulted in 55 more Tory MPs (317) than Labour MPs (262).

Stats chart by Awake the Dragon

Interestingly, at least for numbers geeks like me, if you divide the total number of votes for each of the two main parties by the number of MPs elected for each of the two main parties this is the result:
  • Tory 13,669,883 votes / 317 seats = 43,122 average votes per elected MP
  • Labour 12,878,460 votes / 262 seats = 49,154 average votes per elected MP
So, nationally, it could be said that each Labour MP speaks for more Labour voters than does each Tory MP for Tory voters!

However, the turnout for the 2017 GE was 32,203,481 voters, equating to 68.8% of the registered electorate of 46,807,385. This means that 14,603,904 people on the electoral register did not vote. That non-voting figure is larger than the number of voters who voted for either the Tory or the Labour party, so those votes can and would make a difference.  Add onto that the number of people eligible to vote but who are not on the electoral register, which is thought to be around a further 4 million people, and you see a different picture of voter power.

Stats chart by Awake the Dragon

What conclusion might we draw from the figures above? Clearly, that governments are elected not by a majority of the voting age population, but by a majority of the population who bothers to vote. For those who say that voting changes nothing, the figures would indicate otherwise, as if the 20 million people who were eligible to vote on 8th June 2017 had done so, the country might not be enduring yet another austerity driven government benefiting the privileged few and causing hardship and harm to many. The message really is, "EVERY VOTE COUNTS!"

To make sure that you have and keep your eligibility to vote at future elections, please make sure you are on the electoral register. See here for how: https://www.gov.uk/browse/citizenship/voting - don't put it off. There is supposed to be a fixed five year term between General Elections but, as we saw in June 2017, things can change resulting in an early GE, especially with the uncertainty of the DUP continuing to prop up the Tory government if the Irish border / BREXIT issue causes a rift.

Thursday, 20 April 2017

62% voted for Jeremy Corbyn as next Prime Minister!

So Theresa May has called for a General Election, which has been approved by a massive majority of MPs: 522 for and 13 against. I'm not sure happened to the other MPs, as there are 650 of them in the Commons...  but whatever, it was an overwhelming vote for a General Election on Thursday 8th June.

Why she has chosen to do this, only a week after saying yet again that the next GE would be in 2020, is anyone's guess. Speculation abounds that there may be a connection to the ongoing police enquiry into Tory election fraud from the 2015 GE, whilst others have suggested recent polls suggesting poor results for Labour have been the trigger.

But, on Wednesday, the morning after the PM announced she was requesting a GE in June, the ITV This Morning programme ran an online poll of viewers, asking who the viewers wanted to be the next PM. The results were astonishing for those who only take note of what the biased mainstream media have been saying about Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, the man who the media have spent most of the last  two years trying to discredit, dishearten and destroy.  The poll found that of 89,600 votes, 62% wanted to see Jeremy Corbyn as next PM, as against just 24% of votes for Theresa May. That is some poll!

Meanwhile, those of us who have been supporting Jeremy Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party and are fully behind Labour's policies for a better Britain are smiling sweetly, and resisting the urge to say, "I told you so."  




Monday, 6 March 2017

BBC News Media - Evidence of Continuing Bias?

Alston Labour Party Branch at the #OurNHS March London
Sat 4th March 2017 © Alice Bondi
Following on from yesterday's #OurNHS March where over 250,000 people from all over the UK marched through London, a fact the BBC and some other mainstream British media seems to have ignored or referred to in passing, I felt a formal complaint to the BBC was in order. I do not have a TV so never see the BBC's TV output, but have been told by friends who do that there was scant mention of the march in the TV news. I listened to the R4 News where the same was the case, whilst looking at the BBC News online pages you would not even be aware that there had been a march if that was your only source of news as it did not feature in their top UK news stories, and only shows up if you really dig for it.

This is yet another instance of the sort of media bias we have seen over the last couple of years - Media Lens did a big exposé of this last November under the title BBC Propaganda Watch: Tell-Tale Signs That Slip Through The Cracks. 

My complaint is as follows:
Yesterday there was one of the biggest marches in London in support of the NHS & against the cutbacks in its funding & services. Over 250,000 people (police estimate) marched through London over a 4-5 hour period. The only coverage on the BBC R4 News was scant mentions of "thousands marched through London today", whilst the BBC News website seems to have no coverage or photos of the March, nor any journalistic coverage, nor interviews with those concerned, who ranged from the Labour Party leader and Shadow Chancellor, trades union general secretaries, health service workers of all grades, NHS service consumers, and a whole raft of concerned citizens who had travelled from every part of the UK to support this march. Contrast this with the more than 2 minutes of video broadcast yesterday evening by a German broadcaster, highlighting not only the march in London but also the dire state of the NHS in the UK under the current government. This is blatant bias on the part of the BBC, who have a duty to provide impartial and comprehensive news to the people of this country. Those who make the decisions not to cover such big events are sanitising the news and colluding with an increasingly fascist and intolerant government attempting to further subdue the population through the reduction in public services and the stripping of dignity from the most needy and vulnerable citizens. As the BBC is publicly funded via the licence fee my complaint is that the biased coverage against the march and against the Labour Party's current leadership is against its own constitution and against the principles of fairness and natural justice. I request a full and detailed investigation into the lack of 4th March coverage and the bias that underpins the scant coverage of both popular mass actions and the current Labour leadership.
The BBC website Complaints pages say they will respond within 2 weeks, so I shall wait and see the outcome.

Meanwhile if, like me, you were unable to go to the march, you may like to see the video on YouTube which recorded all 3½ hours plus of it!



Contingents certainly went from Cumbria were I live, leaving home around 4am to make the journey down to London by coach to be there in time for the march start at noon. After walking through the capital, and listening to various speakers as well they set off on the journey back in the late afternoon and many will not have reached home until around midnight. Such a long day, but that so many people did make those sorts of journeys to take part shows the strength of feeling in the country in support of #OurNHS and the people who work within it.

Friday, 27 January 2017

BREXIT this and BREXIT that.... why are MPs resigning from the Shadow Cabinet again?

I have no love for BREXIT, as readers of this blog will know. The whole 2015 EU Referendum thing was so badly thought out last year, and David Cameron should be called to account for his actions.

Over the last 24 hours members of the Shadow team have resigned, citing concerns over Article 50 and a three-line Whip imposed on Labour MPs, triggering fears of a repeat of last year's wholesale ship-jumping by MPs intent on discrediting Jeremy Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party.

The Labour Party is caught in a difficult position over the BREXIT vote.  Tory MPs are overwhelmingly (bar one so far) in favour of triggering Article 50, whilst the LibDems (all 9 of them), the sole Green MP and the SNP are all against it.  Labour however has the dichotomy of having MPs representing the highest vote Remain areas and the highest vote Leave areas, so any Labour MP where the Remain vote carried has a duty to their electorate to reflect the wishes of their constituents. Hence the rebellion against the party Whip. For those MPs where the Leave vote carried but who campaigned for Remain there is the problem of which way to vote on the Bill.


But, as Chris Hanretty blogged, not all voting areas reflected whole constituencies, so it is not possible to tell how every constituency voted. Some areas cover multiple whole or part constituencies, so how do you apportion voter intent to a constituency there?

In my own (Westmorland & Lonsdale - the big yellow area in the north-west of England on the map represented by LibDem leader Tim Farron) it was a clear Remain vote, one of the few Remainer areas in England outside of London and the South-East. Looking at the map gives a better picture of which areas voted Remain and which voted Leave.


However,  Labour voters nationally voted by 65% to Remain in the EU as this YouGov poll showed (despite being in the 50-64 age group my husband and I both voted Remain!)


The results show that 51.89% of all those who voted vote Leave


and as that is a simple majority it would appear to be the democratic thing to abide by it, hence the official Labour Party stance. So it does give a huge problem for Labour MPs who have to balance the will of their local electorate as against the will of the national electorate and the will of Labour supporters and voters generally.

Which brings us to the other big problem: England and Wales voted to leave, Scotland and Northern Ireland didn't, so how will BREXIT for the United Kingdom manage that, and will the UK itself survive BREXIT or will it result is the break up of the union?


All of this totally ignores the fact that the Referendum as created by the European Union Referendum Act 2015 was an ADVISORY one not a MANDATORY one, so should have been treated as an Opinion Poll to lead onto further negotiation, rather than a clear instruction to leave the EU, and you then end up with the almighty mess we currently have!


Saturday, 14 January 2017

On the Momentum new constitution furore...

I have no real interest in all the arguments and differences at the "top" of the organisation. For me what matters is what happens on the ground, and if Momentum helps achieve a Labour govt, Labour cllrs, and success at by-elections then that's fine, but I see no point in endless disputes about how things are run. That is just counter-productive and generates negative feedback in both the media and within the wider Labour Party itself.

I don't want to see another organisation with similar structures to the Labour Party. Why would Momentum want to copy that? Why do we need delegates and national committees and policies etc? Surely if we are supporting a Corbyn-led LP then those are the policies we follow and support? Momentum is not, nor should it be, a party within a party. 

Simply operating as activist clusters supporting Labour candidates and policies is the better option. What we need is local activism: feet on the ground, members knocking on doors, holding open discussions, making contacts with voters, working with comrades in trades unions, being active in socialist campaigns and projects that benefit our communities, etc...

So, unless Momentum stops all the squabbling and silliness it will die a death. Meanwhile, we have work to do here in Cumbria, so let's get on with it!

Friday, 13 January 2017

New year, new targets...


It's almost two weeks into 2017 and I feel I have achieved very little so far, other than attending a very interesting Momentum-organised meeting in Kendal at which Julie Ward, MEP for the North West, was guest speaker.

I decided that I would review what I want to achieve politically, and then I can work out how to achieve those aims... so here goes.

My aims and objectives are

  • ... to achieve a Labour government for the country,
  • ... to help elect Labour MPs in by-elections,
  • ... to help elect councillors to county and district councils,
  • ... to raise the profile in a positive way of the Labour Party,
  • ... to promote the social and economic policies for the country put forward by Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell,
Next step is to work out how best to achieve these...  watch this space! 





Saturday, 1 October 2016

Being a left-wing nuisance is necessary and desirable

I wrote this on Saturday, 8 August 2015, during last year's Labour Leadership election, and it appeared on my personal blog rather than this one, but a year on it is worth reposting onto Awake the Dragon, as it outlines why my support for the re-elected leader, Jeremy Corbyn remains steadfast.

Becoming involved once more in the politics of the Labour Party, and the election for its new leader has given me much to think about over the past weeks. Coming from a trades union background (USDAW), serving on trades councils, and being appointed as a national officer for BTOG at, what was then, a very young age for such a job (26) I met and worked with many committed trades unionists who were considerably older than I was. Indeed, many were old enough to be my parent or even grand-parent, in some instances!

Having that experience helped me to learn such a lot about the history of the Labour Party, from those involved, and what it stood for, and what it had achieved in the years before I was born. I enjoyed long chats with people who had been on the Aldermaston Marches, with people who had been involved with the NHS at its inception, and with those who had been involved with various labour disputes over the decades. It was, for me, where I honed my political beliefs, beliefs which I had first heard at the knee of my lifelong Socialist grandfather, who died when I was 10 years old.

One of the women with whom I had contact whilst working at USDAW was the late Audrey Wise (1935-2000), former MP for Coventry South West (1974-1979) and Preston (1987-2000). Audrey Wise teamed up with Jeff Rooker to draw up the Rooker-Wise Amendment to the then Chancellor Denis Healey's 1977 finance bill. The Rooker-Wise Amendment "introduced retrospective inflation-proofing on tax allowances, which led to £450m being handed back to taxpayers." That was quite an achievement - two backbench MPs managing to over ride the plans of the Labour government's own Chancellor for the people. It made me realise that ordinary people could make changes happen if they stand up for what they believe in.

Audrey was a huge inspiration to me. She was never afraid to say what she thought, she spoke her mind, and stood firm for her principles. According to her obituary in The Guardian, "At Westminster in the 1970s she was regarded as something of a left-wing nuisance, a state of affairs that she viewed as necessary and desirable." In many ways Jeremy Corbyn reminds me of Audrey: firm in his beliefs, principled, straight talking, able to inspire people and to make them believe that they can make changes happen. It's also what I believe in.

Sunday, 25 September 2016

An Open Letter to the Parliamentary Labour Party

Dear Comrades, yes I address you as such as that is what we are, comrades in the Labour Party, despite the uncomradely behaviour of some of you over the past twelve months. I realise that the election of Jeremy Corbyn as party leader in September 2015 was a huge shock to some of you - but then so many of you have only ever known New Labour, not the real Labour Party of previous generations. Those few older MPs who were seduced by NeoLiberalism, and who moved away from the Party's founding principles as outlined in the original Clause IV, seem to have become entrenched in a mainstream media driven scenario that Labour is a party of middle-class, comfortably off, aspirational business folk in suits served by career politicians whose interest do not coincide much with those of the grassroots members and the electorate.

Younger MPs can almost, in a way, be forgiven for believing this as they have hardly known the Labour Party to be any different. How could they? After the emergence of Neil Kinnock as leader in 1983 the party began its move to the centre right, losing the 1987 General Election in the process and, after abandoning Labour policy on trades union closed shops in 1989 and the following the witchhunt and subsequent expulsion of the left-wing Militant Tendency from the Labour Party in 1991, it lost yet another General Election in 1992.  This led to a change of leadership with the late lamented John Smith whose premature death, less than two years later, precipitated the rise in fortune of Tony Blair, whose landslide General Election victory of 1997 lead to the party moving even further to the right.

Throughout the Blair and subsequent Gordon Brown years the party lost touch with a large number of its traditional supporters. Notice that I say supporters not members, as many of us who were members left the party as a result of that shift to the right. We no longer felt comfortable in a party where special advisors held sway, and where the majority of party funding was coming from rich businessmen and champagne socialists, where the voices of the trades unions who had been our traditional supporters were dismissed, and where a decision to go to war was made on spurious and unsubstantiated evidence. Where the voices of members were over-ruled by those of the Leader's Office, and where decisions such as selecting prospective parliamentary candidates were taken by the NEC instead of at local level by the membership in their constituency parties. In just 13 years the Labour Party membership dropped from over 400,000 in 1997 to just 150,000 by 2010, alongside that the party lost around 5 million voters. Hardly a success story was it? Did you ask yourself why?


Did you notice? Did you, as MPs ask yourself why that might have happened? Did it occur to you to go and talk to members about why we felt disengaged from the party? Did it occur to you to go out and and talk to electors about why they had walked away en masse from voting Labour? Did you assume it was just a blip and all would soon be back to normal? Well, that didn't happen did it?

Yet twelve months ago you had the chance to make a difference, with a new party leader, and a resurgence of support for socialist policies - so-called radical stuff, like decent housing for everyone, a properly funded NHS free at the point of use, nationalisation of the railways, improved public services, sorting out the mess that is education, making sure that our elderly and disabled do not have a daily struggle to exist, that people are not reliant on food banks to survive - food banks, in 2016! If that is not a national disgrace I don't know what is! What did many of you do? 172 of you voted within the PLP to undermine the democratically elected leader and force a leadership challenge, which is effectively spitting in the face of the 59.5% of the membership who voted for Jeremy Corbyn - those are the people who also helped to get each of you elected as MPs, so perhaps you might like to show them a little respect? You also leaked stories to the media, which being owned by hugely rich individuals with vested interests in the status quo, is hostile to the idea of a socialist government, and you worked against him and his team in more ways that we the membership will ever be able to know - but let me tell you this, we may not know the detail but we know the fact that it happened and we have long memories.


Now comrades, you have a second chance. The Labour Party membership has overwhelmingly re-elected Jeremy Corbyn as leader, this time with a bigger majority than a year ago - some 61.8% of the vote for him - and he had over 50% of the votes in each category of membership, so you cannot deny that he has a mandate from the membership. The members will also expect each of you to accept and respect that mandate and not to work against the leader we have chosen. In case you have forgotten, this is called democracy and we in the Labour Party espouse it - as it says on the back of our membership cards - The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. You are also expected not to leak information to a hostile media, nor to work to overthrow the elected leader. If you can't manage to do that then you might also find that we, the members, can't find it within our hearts to forgive your betrayals and we may also not be too happy, when it comes to election time, to give up our precious free time to help you get re-elected to carry on undermining him.


Please comrades, do not take this as a threat, it is simply a statement of fact. There is a huge amount of anger amongst party members at what we perceive as treachery, disloyalty or just disingenuity and you have a lot of work to do to put things right and regain our trust. And it is all about trust and loyalty. It's about respect for members and for the democratic mandate which has been given to the leader. It's about decency and honesty. It's also about understanding that the Labour Party is a democratic socialist party and if you are not a democratic socialist then you do not belong in it!

I sincerely hope that you all will take some time to search your consciences and consider your positions. Members do not want to see MP deselections or a split in the party, we want to see a united party that is taking on the Tory government and defending those whom the party was founded to represent. We are not Tory-lite, we are not a party of austerity, we are not a party that should be funded by, and in the pockets of, businesses. We are Labour, together we are strong. Be with us now, or go.

Thursday, 11 August 2016

Should Jeremy Corbyn worry about not getting the GMB endorsement?

One of today's big stories is that the GMB union has endorsed Owen Smith for Labour leader in this year's leadership contest, as against no endorsement by them last year. I can partially understand the decision, as GMB represents Trident workers and Owen is pro-Trident renewal whilst Jeremy is anti-Trident renewal, so there is some protecting of their interests involved, but that ignores the fact that keeping Trident is still currently national Labour Party policy and that at its annual GMB congress earlier this year the union called for "clear and unambiguous" support for Mr Corbyn.

It does seem that the buzz about how good having the GMB's support, as one of the UK's biggest unions, is a bit disingenuous given that of the GMB's massive 641,000 members only 43,419 of them voted in the endorsement ballot (i.e. 6.77% of the GMB membership). Of those 43,419 members the 60% who voted for Owen represent 26,051 members, which as a percentage of the total is just 4.06% of the whole GMB membership, which might just take the gloss off the gingerbread slightly. Ballot figures are as given in the BBC News story here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37026145

Meanwhile, there are multiple reports on social media by GMB members who are asking, "what ballot?" as they claim they have not been asked at all, as some of the examples below show:
Tim Roache, GMB's General Secretary, took to Twitter to refute the claims and to assert all GMB members were balloted:
But members in Scotland were excluded from the ballot (has the GMB written off Labour in Scotland?) as this article on the GMB website shows, whilst NewTekWorldNews claims that ​Scotland didn't want to participate in the nominations process.

Regardless of how the ballot was conducted, one thing that did come out of the various figures being bandied about today was that the GMB has only around 30,000 members paying the political levy as part of their membership, so they will be the ones who can actually vote in the leadership election itself once ballot forms are sent out from 22nd August, but will they and, crucially, for whom?

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

How the Parliamentary Labour Party is showing its contempt for the Labour Party membership

Over 250,000 Labour Party members voted for Jeremy Corbyn as party leader last September (2015). He stood on a ticket of change, of returning to a society where everyone will be treated fairly and decently, and where the privileged few will not prosper at the expense and suffering of the majority of the citizens of the country.


The Parliamentary Labour Party which consists of 229 Labour MPs has decided by a majority that they do not want him to remain as leader despite the wishes of the membership. Some of those same Labour MPs have referred to the members supporting Jeremy Corbyn as "dogs", which shows their contempt for the membership. This is the membership who, come every election, works their socks off to get said MP's elected to Parliament.

By attacking the democratically elected leader in this manner they are also attacking all of the membership who support him. We will not forget those who took part in this coup against democracy. Evidence has come to light that this has been an orchestrated event carried out with the collusion of the mainstream media, whose constant attacks on Jeremy Corbyn have been aimed at undermining his leadership in the eyes of both the membership and the country.

There is a proper and accepted method of challenging an elected leader under the Party Rule Book but the way the PLP has acted this week is not it (Labour MPs retain the power to trigger an extraordinary or "special" Labour Party Conference to choose a new leader if they lose confidence in their existing leader). Their actions have no legitimacy under the Rule Book and are, quite frankly, disgraceful behaviour on the part of those PLP members who took part in the orchestrated resignations and coup against Jeremy Corbyn.

Labour Party members voted overwhelmingly for change by electing Jeremy Corbyn as the party leader. We do not expect that vote, that mandate, to be ignored or overturned by careerist politicians in Labour seats. Any attempt by those MPs opposing the democratically elected leader will be resisted by the membership.

Thursday, 12 May 2016

So why did I join the Labour Party?

I was recently asked a question: why did you join the Labour Party?  Thinking about why I did took me back to the early years of my life and it was all my grandpa's doing...

I loved listening to my grandpa when I was a little girl - he died when I was 9 - and he was a lifelong socialist, having joined the army at 15 (having lied about his age), been shipped out to France in WW1, saw what "the nobs" did to the troops, and came home totally disillusioned with the army and those in charge of the country.

Having been gassed in the trenches he was bedridden by the time I was born, and I used to sit and listen to him talk about the old socialists, about how he wasn't able to speak out against exploitation of workers for fear of losing his job as a tram driver - which with a wife and 4 kids would have meant homelessness and penury, about the desperate situation of families in the 1930's depression when there was no work and no money coming in, about having to pay to see the doctor if you were ill, about the setting up of the welfare state, about Nye Bevan and the creation of the NHS after WW2, about houses being built to replace slums, and about the fact that he had an old age pension to live on until he died at the age of 67.

His words are still with me and he profoundly influenced my thinking and my political views.

When I left school and started work in a local shop (at 16) I joined the shop-workers' trades union and then the Labour Party in Kendal. I served on Kendal trades council, and helped canvas with the Labour Party for local councillors before moving to London to work for USDAW, and later for another smaller transport trades union. I was very much involved in trades union campaigns in London in the 1980s, attended and spoke at USDAW conferences as a delegate, and canvassed for Labour in Ilford, Camden and Hackney in various elections.

I listened to, and had the pleasure of meeting, Tony Benn at one of the fringe meetings during the miners' strike in 1984; I set up and ran a food collection point for Kent miners from our union office during that strike; helped raise money to send to the women of the Greenham Common Peace Camp; took part in endless marches and demo's in Liverpool and London against the privatisations that were happening under Margaret Thatcher's Tory government; and stood in vigils outside the South African embassy against apartheid (I wasn't there at the time Jeremy Corbyn was arrested but I remember it happening and seeing the newspaper coverage of it) and outside the American embassy against Cruse missiles.

In 1986 I moved back north with my new baby son and dropped out of political activity to become involved in small village life. I found that it is very easy to forget that the rest of the world moves on when you live in a rural area where little changes year on year.  I hated seeing what was happening in the Labour Party under Blair's leadership so I walked away and thought I would never come back if it was going along that road. For me the change to Clause 4, and the invasion of Iraq were not compatible with Socialism, and as time went on I could see little difference between New Labour (as it became known) and the previous Tory government.

In 2010 when the Tories and Lib Dems formed the coalition government I had no idea that things were going to get worse. My local MP is a LibDem and he has always been a decent-enough chap who seems to work hard for his constituency, but then things started to decline. Friends elsewhere and locally started sharing petitions about cut backs and closures; the pension age for women of my age group suddenly shot up from 60 to 65, then 66; hospitals were threatened with cuts; social services were slashed; libraries were closing; schools were becoming academies; student university fees rocketed from £3,000 pa to £9,000 pa; and the welfare benefits system seemed to be all but dismantled, with horrendous bullying of claimants leading to mental illness and suicides in many cases. What was going on? It was enough to shake me out of my rural bubble and make me take more notice. I signed petitions, wrote letters to the aforementioned MP, and started talking about politics again.

Then in 2015 another disaster happened: the Tories were re-elected with a majority so they no longer need the LibDem support to make a government, which was just as well for the latter, as the LibDems had lost all but 8 of their seats, presumably as punishment for doing the 2010 deal with the Tories. I was in shock: how could this be? How could people vote for a party which cut vital services? A party which hounded sick and disabled people so that they committed suicide rather than face that terrible system. A party which claimed that austerity was the only way to sort out the country's financial situation, whilst still wanting to spend billions of pounds on a weapons system that will never be able to be used! The Labour Party clearly had not made its opposition to the Tories clear enough: being Tory light isn't what opposition is all about, and the electoral result showed it. I was close to despair!

Then a man called Jeremy Corbyn hit the headlines; I listened to his speeches and he re-lit my fire. I remembered him from the 1980's newspaper coverage back in London, so I signed up as a supporter and paid my £3 so I could vote for him then, as I didn't get any papers from that (although my husband and son - who signed up after me - did get them), I joined as a full member on the last day I could prior to the leadership election. I am so glad that I did! I got my ballot papers, voted for JC, and did my bit on social media to help raise awareness of him. On the day the announcement was due I was sat shaking like a leaf in a gale, desperate for Jeremy Corbyn to win and dreading what would happen if he didn't.  I saw the ballot result and promptly burst into tears, such was my relief, and cried for half an hour!

Since then I've attended local CLP meetings, volunteered to help with the website/social media team for the CLP, leafleted in support of our local council candidate, and I am helping set up a Momentum branch for the area. Am I back? Yes! Why? Because I believe that with a Labour government, under the leadership team of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, people will get a far fairer deal out of life.

I do not support austerity, which causes a downward spiral in the economy to the detriment of public services and people's lives. I do not support cuts in services, or privatising NHS services, or bullying people off benefits, or testing small children to make the schools look good in their league tables, or selling off social housing. I don't want to see people living in fear of the DWP, or worrying about how pay their rent/mortgage or feed their kids, of choosing whether to eat or have heating. I do support everyone being entitled to a decent standard of living and for society to treat everyone equally.

The mark of a decent society, my grandpa used to say, is demonstrated by how the old, the weak, the sick and the vulnerable are treated within it. Under that yardstick the Tories have failed miserably, but Labour under Jeremy Corbyn can and will succeed, and I'm going to help him as much as I can!

Friday, 29 April 2016

Using the racism card to undermine voter confidence ahead of May 5th elections.

The suspensions from the Labour Party of Bradford West MP Naz Shah and former London Mayor, Ken Livingstone, has brought this issue to the forefront of the mainstream media (MSM) just a week away from the Elections on May 5th, and the cynical amongst us might wonder if this is a deliberate ploy from the MSM and the anti-Corbyn brigade to make Labour less attractive in the polls and give the anti-Corbyn folks a weapon to launch a leadership bid to oust Jeremy Corbyn as leader as a result.

Looking at the evidence of what has been said, it seems that some anti-Corbyn folks have jumped on the bandwagon and are happy to damage their own Party's electoral chances in order to oppose the democratically elected Party leader, something which others in the Party claim should result in the suspension of those seeking to undermine the leadership.

The biggest danger for the Labour Party is that jumping onto this bandwagon and conducting a witch-hunt against suspected or claimed anti-Semites is simply playing into the hands of those who are seeking the removal of Jeremy Corbyn as Party leader.

Further reading:
How to Criticize Israel Without Being Anti-SemiticZionism, anti-Semitism and colonialism

Wednesday, 20 April 2016

Keep the link between the Co-operative Group & the Co-operative Party

Last year Co-operative Group members sent a resounding message of support for continuing the historic relationship with the Co-operative Party, by passing Motion 10 at their AGM in May 2015. This was not just a vote in favour of the Co-operative Group continuing its subscription to the Party but also in favour of the Co-operative Group continuing to be actively engaged in making the case for a more co-operative Britain.

The case is just as compelling in 2016 as it was last year. 

The historic partnership between the Co-operative Party and the Co-operative Group is vital if the Group wants to be at the heart of demonstrating that co-operatives are a better way of doing business.

The co-operative movement has always been a powerful advocate for a society where wealth and power are more equally shared.

Given rising inequality, the failure of our economy to deliver fair rewards for the many not just the few, and the potential for the co-operative movement to play an even bigger role in our society and in our communities, it is vital that the movement continues to have a voice in the rooms where decisions are made – in Westminster, in Holyrood, in Cardiff Bay and in town halls up and down Britain.

So if you are a member of the Co-operative Group, vote in favour of the motion on political subscriptions again at the AGM on 21st May or in advance online.

Friday, 6 November 2015

Labour lacks "serious opposition" claims Lord Mandelson

Peter Mandelson expressed his concern that Jeremy Corbyn's leadership is a problem not just for Labour, but for the country, when he appeared on the BBC's HardTalk last night. "It is a very, very bad and sad day for this country," Lord Mandelson said, "when we do not have a serious opposition and a serious alternative to the Government."
I am not sure where Peter Mandelson has been keeping himself since September 12th, but there is more serious and active opposition by the current Opposition than we have seen in the Labour Party in many a long year.

During the interview by Stephen Sackur, Mandelson repeated many of the same old untruths and bits of misinformation that we have read and heard in the media over the last several months. His claims that Jeremy Corbyn is "far-left", that Harriet Harman opened the door to everyone to join in with the £3 vote, that Jeremy Corbyn changed his mind about Trident at the Labour Party Conference, and that despite Corbyn's claim of his belief in equality he appointed men to the top Shadow Cabinet positions.

Just for the record, Corbyn is not "far-left", his views reflect those of many others on the left or centre-left (not far-left or hard-left or even ultra-hard-left!) of the Party, even many in the centre of it! In fact, until the Blairite tendency moved the Party so far to the right that it was hard to differentiate between the Blairites and the Tories, Corbyn's views on many issues were pretty much standard Labour Party policy!

Harriet Harman did not come up with the £3 vote scheme. It was actually a change brought in by Ed Miliband in 2014 and supported by Mandelson's former boss, Tony Blair! In fact Blair actually said that it was a reform that his own leadership should have thought of.

And as for the Trident issue at Party Conference, that was not Corbyn's call either. At Labour Party conferences there is a committee which determines which subjects are debated. The short-list of subjects are put to a vote of those attending, thus it was conference itself which decided not to discuss the issue of Trident this year. 

As for the top Shadow Cabinet positions statement, this is very much a macho attitude! That positions of Chancellor, Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary are seen as the Top Jobs reflects an out-of-date view of what are priorities in government and society. Implying that the other Shadow Cabinet roles are less important denigrates whole sectors of society. It infers that health, education, employment, business, welfare, environment, transport, etc are less important issues, whereas to the electorate and I suspect to Corbyn these are most often the most important aspects of government as they have a direct and personal effect on each and every one of us. Cut backs in health or education funding have a more direct impact on us than does our foreign policy, yet Foreign Secretary is considered to be a Top Job by some. Clearly Corbyn will form his own opinions on what is important, but his first Shadow Cabinet does have a majority of women members - the first time any frontbench team has done so, so that's one up for him then!

Now we have corrected Lord Mandelson, what else can we say about the interview? Jeremy Corbyn is unelectable, and he cannot lead the Labour Party to victory and government, seems to be two main themes of Mandelson's spiel. In between the chest-beating mea culpa lament of "We didn't make enough changes ourself" and "We lost our way" type comments, it is quite clear that Mandelson has no intention of supporting the new leader or his attempt to win the next election. There was a lot of talk of "being ready" for when Corbyn goes (he said stands down but could just as easily have meant gets pushed out) and lots of guff about the Party not sharing Corbyn's aims for the Party, despite his "stonking" victory in the leadership election with just shy of 60% of the votes across all three voting sections.

Mandelson's sly inference that it was only the £3 supporters and the trades unions members voting that gave Corbyn his victory belies the fact that the full member vote of 121,751 out of 245,520 for Corbyn was only just shy of the 50% victory mark in itself, A further 1,010 full members voting for him would have given Corbyn the leadership even without the ability of the registered supporters and the trades unions members to vote, and Corbyn polled almost as many votes alone as the other three candidates did between them!  On that basis Mandelson cannot justify any claim that full members do not agree with Jeremy Corbyn's policies.

Mandelson's claimed that 47%  of the people who voted Labour in the 2015 General Election do not see Corbyn as leadership material, but that could also mean that 53% do see him as such!  But what about the 35% of the electorate who have not voted for anyone, many of whom claim they cannot see any difference between the Tories, LibDems and New Labour, so why vote?  Those people are amongst the sector of the electorate which has been excited and energised by the emergence of Corbyn as the Labour Party Leader. Many of them are becoming politically active for the first time ever, and come 2020 they will no longer be in the silent third, they will be voting!

Meanwhile, right across the country members and supporters are readying themselves to fight local elections in 2016. Indeed, some are already planning their campaign in the by-election caused by the death recently of the veteran MP, Michael Meacher.  Those of us who will be campaigning for local council seats do so in the strong hope that this will help the Party win votes and seats in the general election in 2020 also. We expect that it will be a hard fight; after all, we have to reconnect with an electorate that has become increasingly disillusioned with the New Labour Party of Blair and Mandelson, and it is to them that we have to establish our credibility as a Party fit for government. That job will be made all the harder by the whingers and the doomsayers, such as Mandelson, undermining the Party's democratically elected leader! So my message to him, and others like him, is this, "Button it! Support Corbyn. Help us win!"

Thursday, 22 October 2015

Does the Labour Campaign for the Self Employed give us a glimmer of hope?

The creation of the Labour Campaign for the Self Employed has given hope to many sole traders and micro-businesses that their concerns may at last find a champion. I am hoping that the Campaign will address the issues that face us in respect of VAT changes affecting digital cross-border sales. This is the message I have sent to the campaign today: 

The imposition of impossible EU regulations such as the VAT scheme for digital cross-border sales that came in on 1st Jan 2015 is a problem for us. It is impossible to comply with in many cases and is putting sole traders and micro-businesses at a huge disadvantage and driving trade back to the big guys like Amazon, as the smaller traders simply cannot meet the requirements of the rules at any price!

The EU has accepted that small traders being hurt was an unforseen and unintended consequence of the new rules, and that it was never the EU's plan to affect us, as according to the EU they simply did not know that we would be affected at all. The assumption appears to have been, "Don't you all sell via Amazon or eBay anyhow?" - No we do not!

For any sole trader or micro-business that sells cross-border digital products directly from its own website the initial costs of the changes required to the website are anything up to £4,000 to make the website capable of collecting the proof needed, and even then we cannot guarantee the data that we have to collect from the buyer.

The change was intended to prevent the big guys like Amazon and eBay from routing their sales via the country with the lowest VAT rate (i.e. Luxemburg mainly).  The irony is that the new rules are forcing many of us to sell via the big guys now as they can meet the new rules, whereas we cannot.

Whilst previously we would have had to charge VAT on digital cross border sales at the UK rate only if our turnover exceeded the £81,000 VAT threshold for domestic sales, now we have to charge VAT at the rate in the buyer's country and there is no threshold for digital cross-border sales, so even if we sell a music mp3 or an ebook or a knitting pattern for less than a £1 we have to register under the scheme and collect the VAT and pay it on to the buyer's tax authority.

To do so we have to *prove* where the buyer is based and calculate the VAT rate for that country and charge the buyer the relevant rate for the goods purchased (one of 70+ rates in 28 countries), and then remit the VAT to that country either directly or via one of the MOSS schemes that has been set up by different country tax authorities.

The proof we can accept includes an IP address, but this is not reliable evidence of geographical location in many cases and can be spoofed by buyers or reported incorrectly depending on how the buyer is connecting to the website to buy.

The UK government could unilaterally suspend the new rules until the EU gets the issue sorted and brings in the promised small turnover threshold but despite being asked to do so it has not. The threshold could take a couple of years to arrive as it has to be discussed and agreed by all EU member states, meanwhile we are struggling with trying to comply, or we can simply refuse to sell outside the UK (which also falls foul of another EU requirement about free trade across the EU!)

Meanwhile, you can keep up to date with progress of the threshold over on the website of the EU VAT ACTION CAMPAIGN


50 broken Tory promises - how many more to come?

Since the election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party my previously politically passive husband has become politically vocal. I think he finally has hope that we will see a change for the better once we can get rid of this Tory Govt. and replace it with a proper real Labour one!

This is one of the posts that he shared recently on Facebook - it sums up more succinctly than I can why the Tory Govt. needs to go!

Here are 50 more broken Tory promises from the first five years of failure in Downing Street:

We will balance the books by 2015
THE TRUTH: Britain still has a budget deficit of £90billion

We will pay down Britain’s debts
THE TRUTH: George Osborne has borrowed over £500billion in five years - more than Labour did in 13

We will get net immigration down to the tens of thousands
THE TRUTH: Net immigration is almost 300,000 per year

No more top-down reorganisations of the NHS
THE TRUTH: £3billion wasted on the biggest reorganisation in NHS history

We will improve your living standards
THE TRUTH: Families £1,600-a-year worse off than in 2010

We will deport more foreign criminals
THE TRUTH: The number of foreign crooks on our streets soars 20%

We will keep our nation’s defences strong
THE TRUTH: Army hacked back by 20,000 troops to its lowest level since the Napoleonic wars

We will not raise VAT
THE TRUTH: VAT hiked to 20%, costing the average family £450-a-year

We will protect the vulnerable from the cuts
THE TRUTH: Cruel welfare sanctions force one million people to use food banks

We’re all in it together
THE TRUTH: Millionaires get a £100,000-a-year tax cut - the poor get the £15-a-week Bedroom Tax

GP access promised 12 hours a day, seven days a week
THE TRUTH: Patients face a 10-day wait to see their family doctor

We will get tough on illegal immigrants
THE TRUTH: Home Office loses track of 174,000 illegal immigrants

We will get tough on tax avoidance
THE TRUTH: The Treasury is still missing out on an estimated £34billion a year

We will stop the closure of A&E and maternity wards
THE TRUTH: Dozens closed or downgraded since 2010

We will cut the number of MPs by 10%
THE TRUTH: Not a single MP has been cut

We will get Britain building again
THE TRUTH: Lowest level of house-building since the war

We will have more small schools with smaller class sizes
THE TRUTH: Number of infants in oversized classes up 200%

We will protect front-line policing
THE TRUTH: 17,000 cops get the boot

We will support families through the tax and benefits system
THE TRUTH: The average family loses £1,100 through tax and benefit changes

We will be the Greenest Government Ever
THE TRUTH: Cameron tells his Ministers to “cut the green cr*p”

We will work towards ending child poverty by 2020
THE TRUTH: 300,000 more kids plunged into poverty

We will enhance the status of teachers
THE TRUTH: Teachers’ pay cut in real terms year after year and their status publicly attacked from Michael Gove

We will revolutionise cancer care
THE TRUTH: The key cancer treatment waiting time target missed for the past four quarters

We will cut the number of highly-paid special advisers in Government
THE TRUTH: Number of special advisers soars by 50%

We will support and improve Sure Start
THE TRUTH: 763 Sure Start centres closed and many more scaled down

We will break down barriers between health and social care
THE TRUTH: Social care funding slashed by £3.5billion as part of attack on town hall budgets

We will restore trust in politics
THE TRUTH: The Tories trouser £30million in donations from hedge funds – which were given a huge tax cut in 2013

We will protect our NHS
THE TRUTH: 40% of NHS contracts handed to private health firms

We will revolutionise prisoner rehab
THE TRUTH: Prison escapes, assaults and suicides all soar as inmates are locked in overcrowded cells for 23 hours a day

We will increase spending on vital flood defences
THE TRUTH: Flood defence spending cut by £247million – and thousands of homes are flooded

We will fight for the union
THE TRUTH: Cameron talks up the SNP to punish Labour and unveils plans to downgrade Scottish MPs at Westminster

We will tackle inequality
THE TRUTH: The richest 1% of Britons now own the same amount of wealth as 54% of the population.

We will treat white collar crime as seriously as other crimes
THE TRUTH: 90% of cyber-crime is allowed to go undetected

No more winter crises in hospital
THE TRUTH: A&E departments in meltdown with one in five patients not seen within the four hour target.

We will invest in our schools
THE TRUTH: Plans to build more than 700 new schools across Britain brutally axed

We will help the disabled into suitable jobs
THE TRUTH: Remploy factories shut down and disabled people subjected to cruel Atos tests

We will make our borders more secure
THE TRUTH: Customs checks for dangerous drugs and weapons scaled back dramatically

We will keep supporting our young people
THE TRUTH: More than 2,000 youth workers axed and at least 350 youth centres closed

We will create security for British businesses
THE TRUTH: HSBC is amongst a raft of UK firms unsettled by Cameron’s EU referendum pledge.

We will not means-test child benefit
THE TRUTH: Child benefit means-tested and then cut for better-off families

We have no plans to get rid of the Education Maintenance Allowance
THE TRUTH: Six months later it is axed completely

We have no plans to get rid of Labour’s Future Jobs Fund
THE TRUTH: Six months later it is axed completely

We will improve Britain’s productivity
THE TRUTH: Productivity is 21% lower than the G7 average

We will deal with long-term unemployment with our ‘Work Programme’
THE TRUTH: More than 650,000 people are left off work for more than a year.

We will bring in 3,000 more midwives
THE TRUTH: Cameron misses his target by almost a third

We will create the “right sort of jobs” to spread prosperity “for the many not the few”
THE TRUTH: 1.7million zero hours contracts handed out in Cameron’s low-pay Britain

No-one will be made homeless by our welfare cuts
THE TRUTH: Rough sleeping up 55% since 2010

We will not allow cuts to front-line services
THE TRUTH: Services are cut across the board, from nearly 500 public libraries to over 1,000 lollipop ladies

We will not cut the NHS
THE TRUTH: The NHS is forced to find £5billion of ‘efficiency savings’ – cuts by any other name

We will have head-to-head TV debates like in 2010
THE TRUTH: Cameron was too chicken to take part

And there will no doubt be more of the same. If you think this is wrong, please join the Labour Party today and help us put things right. https://join.labour.org.uk/


Saturday, 3 October 2015

Now which party is undemocratic, remind me again!

It's interesting that Zac Goldsmith was elected as Tory candidate for London Mayor in an election in which the turnout was just 9,227, of which he polled 6,514 votes. The Tory contest was open to anyone on the electoral roll (presumably in the London area) whether Tory party member or not, although non-members had to register for £1 to be able to cast their vote.

Compare that with the Labour candidate for London Mayor election turnout, which was nearly 90,000, which saw Sadiq Khan polling 48,151 votes. The Labour contest was open to Labour Party members, registered supporters, and affiliated supporters within the London area.

The mainstream media had a field day, shrieking that the Labour Party contest was undemocratic as anyone could sign up as a £3 supporter and vote. Not a critical word was said by that same media about anyone being able to sign up for £1 and vote.

Interesting eh? Now which party is undemocratic, remind me again!



Monday, 28 September 2015

Never let the truth stand in the way of a good story!

This might come as a bit of a shock to some, but things have changed! It seems that some  of the media are having a problem understanding that. It really upsets the press when change happens, as it upsets all their preconceptions and renders their pre-set texts obsolete, so reporters cannot just churn out the same old garbage - they actually have to investigate, to do research, to find out about the changes. What a shame it is that so much of the mainstream media appear to be incapable of doing that.

Not only are they incapable of doing it, but they also appear incapable of understanding information given, or answers to questions they ask. How many times have we heard a reporter state as fact the a politician said "this", when if you go back and check the source of the story the politician said "that" instead.
Reporters seem to feel that this is acceptable, that twisting someone's words, or putting a spin on it, is what reporters should do. Guess what? They are wrong!


So, if you really want to know what a politician such as Jeremy Corbyn, MP, or John McDonnell, MP, has said, why not read their own words instead of the media's spin or twisted versions of them?  Why not watch them on YouTube and actually hear what they say, rather than accept a reporter's interpretation of what they say?  You might be surprised. You might also find that you agree with Jeremy and John. Now that would make a change!

Jeremy Corbyn's priorities: http://jeremycorbyn.org.uk/priorities/
Jeremy Corbyn's articles: http://jeremycorbyn.org.uk/articles/

YouTube interview on C4 by Jon Snow, 16 Sep 2015:


John McDonnell's blog: http://www.john-mcdonnell.net/

YouTube interview on C4 by Jon Snow, 14 Sep 2015: 











Sunday, 27 September 2015

Why do women need a separate voice?

Following coverage of the current Labour Party conference has reminded me of my own years attending party and trades union conferences, especially as yesterday was the Labour Women's Conference before the main Labour Party Conference starting today.

Across social media I have seen questions asking why this happens, when there is no equivalent Labour Men's Conference. That's a good question. Perhaps some of my memories are worth sharing to show where attitudes have (or have not) changed in the intervening years and why the Labour and Trades Union movement has long had women-only meetings and shortlists.

Here's one of those memories to begin with...
Many years ago, as a young delegate to the USDAW annual conference, I wanted to speak on the debate about abortion that took place there.

The conference Chair was male, and he called male delegates to speak on the motion. I was sat right on the front row opposite the Chair and every time I could I stood and raised my hand to speak, every time he ignored me and called another male speaker. This despite USDAW being (certainly at that time) a Union of more women than men (something like a 70% to 30% ratio).

Eventually conference delegates decided that I had been ignored long enough and a chant began in the hall, "Call the woman, call the woman, call the woman" and so the Chair reluctantly had to call me to speak. By that time I was hopping mad, and the speech came out in a much more fiery manner than I had originally planned!
The point of the story is that women faced, and possibly still do face, discrimination even within the Labour and trades union movement, so using the women-only meetings and conferences is sometimes their only way to get their message through. That is actually an indictment of the attitude of some of the men in the movement, and until all men and all women regard each other as equals things will not change.

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Crossing the floor

If you have, like me, become fed up of the endless #piggate  stories flooding the press and social media, you will be glad to know that today's story has nothing in it about quadrupeds of any type!

Instead, I've been watching the steady climb of  membership figures since the announcement of Jeremy Corbyn as the new Leader of the Labour Party on Saturday 12th September.

An article dated 25 September last year (2014) on opendemocracy.net gace the following figures as having just been published in a House of Commons Library Report:
“Latest estimates suggest that the Conservative Party claimed 134,000 members, the Labour party 190,000 and the Liberal Democrat Party 44,000.*” They also say that, in June, UKIP had 39,000 members.
So how does that compare with the figures now, 12 months down the line?  It's hard to be exact as the latest "official" figures published by the House of Commons Library are dated August 2015, and show as follows: 
According to the latest party press releases and media estimates (at 11 August 2015):
- The Conservative Party has around 149,800 members, as of December 2013.
- The Labour Party has around 270,000 members, as of August 2015.
- The Scottish National Party has around 110,000 members, as of June 2015.
- The Liberal Democrat Party has 61,000 members, as of May 2015.
- UKIP has around 42,000 members, as of January 2015.
- The Green Party (England and Wales) has 61,000 members, as of June 2015.
However, what is clear is that whatever the figure was on 12th September, the Labour Party membership has climbed by more than 62,000 since the leadership election result - that's more than the total number of members that UKIP has, crowed the Independent.

Many of the new members are assumed to be from the 105,598 registered supporters (the £3 voters) signing up as full members, although there is evidence that some new members were not previously registered supporters whilst others have crossed the floor from other parties to join the Labour Party.  The total membership of the Labour Party is now reported in the Independent as approx. 360,000, which is probably more than the Conservative, the LibDem and UKIP totals combined!

So, apart from feeling smug, what should we as a party be asking all the new members to do?   We need action, we need people to spread the word about Labour Party policies, we need people to volunteer to deliver leaflets, attend meetings, organise awareness and fund-raising events, talk to anyone and everyone how a Labour government would result in a better, more socially just and caring society in the UK. How a Labour government would protect and improve the NHS; scrap student fees; bring essential services like the railways back into common ownership (not the same old nationalisation which was top heavy and didn't work);  build affordable social housing so that everyone who needs one can afford a home; by providing protection and support via the welfare system or otherwsie to the old, the sick and to people with disabilities of any kind;  to support small businesses and sole traders who have long-been ignored and neglected by all political parties;  by making our communities safer and giving our young people better opportunities for their futures. These are the policies that we need to explain to our friends, our neighbours and the wider society in which we live. Our vision is for a better future for us all in the UK, rather than the most wealthy 1% being OK and everyone else just getting by or suffering.

If you want to join us you would be very welcome:  https://join.labour.org.uk/ and if you are in the Westmorland and Lonsdale constituency we will probably see you at a local South Lakes Labour event very soon!